The $54K Shocker: How to Make EV Charging Massively Cheaper

Photo of author
Written By Derrick Rodriguez

Scientific writer

Imagine cutting the cost of installing public electric vehicle charging stations by more than half while boosting efficiency. It may sound too good to be true, but two engineers have a solution that could revolutionize the EV charging landscape โ€“ by eliminating a crucial but expensive component.

The Costly Culprit: Galvanic Isolation

At the heart of current EV charging systems lies a hardware component called the isolation link, which accounts for a staggering 60% of the cost and 50% of the power loss in these systems. According to the engineers’ calculations, this isolation link adds a whopping $54,000 to the cost of a single 300-kW charging port, translating to over $200,000 for a typical four-port station.

So, what exactly is this costly culprit? The isolation link is a transformer-based system that provides galvanic isolation โ€“ a safety feature that physically separates the power grid from the vehicle’s battery circuit to prevent electric shocks. While crucial for safety, its high cost and inefficiency have become a significant barrier to widespread adoption of public EV charging infrastructure.

Cutting Costs, Boosting Efficiency

Enter Tom Gage and Wally Rippel, the engineers proposing a radical solution: ditch the isolation link altogether. By replacing it with a much simpler and cheaper setup involving a buck regulator and a “double-ground” safety system, they claim to offer the same or even higher levels of safety at a fraction of the cost.

The buck regulator, a device similar to a step-down transformer, would manage any voltage mismatches between the grid and the vehicle’s battery. Meanwhile, the double-ground system with ground-continuity detection would ensure that power is never applied if the ground circuit is compromised, eliminating the risk of electric shocks.

See also  Groundbreaking Diamond Transistor Switches Off by Default: A Leap for Electronics Safety

According to Gage and Rippel, this “direct power conversion” approach could slash equipment costs by more than half while improving energy efficiency by 2-3%. Given that the isolation link alone accounts for $360,000 in a typical four-port charging station, the potential savings across thousands of charging sites are staggering. A study by IEEE Spectrum supports their claims, highlighting the immense cost burden of isolation links.

Paving the Way for EV Adoption

The implications of this cost-cutting solution go beyond mere economics. A robust public charging infrastructure is widely regarded as a critical enabler for widespread EV adoption. Studies have shown that range anxiety and limited charging options remain major barriers for prospective EV buyers.

By making charging stations more affordable for operators, Gage and Rippel’s proposal could accelerate the deployment of thousands of new charging sites in just a few years, rather than a decade or more. This, in turn, could alleviate range anxiety and make EVs a more attractive option for consumers who have been hesitant to make the switch.

While the technical details of their solution may seem complex, the potential impact is clear: a simpler, more cost-effective approach to EV charging could be the catalyst that propels the electric vehicle revolution into overdrive.

Source: IEEE Spectrum